University of Minnesota
University of Minnesota
http://www.umn.edu/

Unit's name.

Timeline

2010 through 2014

Construction; service expected to begin on in 2014

After July 27, 2009

FTA reviews FEIS and related comments; FTA determines whether to approve a full funding grant agreement

July 27, 2009

U of M comments on FEIS will be submitted to the FTA by this deadline

July 21, 2009

U of M faculty committee issues report on CCLRT mitigation, finding current proposals inadequate and incomplete

June 26, 2009

Met Council submits FEIS to the FTA; U of M mitigation concerns remain unaddressed

December 2008 and April 2009

U of M receives draft FEIS from Met Council and expresses concerns about inadequacy of mitigation proposals

August 2008

Met Council submits supplemental draft environmental impact statement (SDEIS) to the FTA; the U submits comments outlining its concerns about needed mitigations

June 2008

CCLRT partners agree to MOU

May 2008

Citing ridership and CEI figures below federal standards for funding, Met Council votes to discontinue work related to northern alignment; work begins on development of MOU to guide Washington Ave. at-grade mitigation plan

March 2008

U of M hires external consultant to study viability of the northern alignment

February 2008

Met Council votes to eliminate the tunnel from the CCLRT plan, and selects Washington Ave. at-grade alignment; U of M votes "yes, with reservations"

December 2007

Anticipating a change in Washington Ave. alignment (from tunnel to at-grade), the U, Hennepin Co., and City of Minneapolis begin planning for at-grade mitigation

2006 through September 2007

Recognizing the cost challenges of a tunnel, the U studies the impact, challenges and needs of an at-grade CCLRT line; presentations made and findings shared on several occasions with Central Corridor Management Committee (CCMC), project staff and partners

December 2006

CCPO receives authority to move into preliminary engineering phase, with tunnel alignment included

June 2006

Met Council submits Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA); plan includes Washington Ave. tunnel; the U formally submits its concerns about the project to the FTA

July 2001

U of M Board of Regents adopts Central Corridor resolution favoring the northern alignment, followed by bus rapid transit; the Board insisted that a tunnel be part of any CCLRT alignment on Washington Avenue

2001

Central Corridor Project Office (CCPO) chooses not to study northern alignment; tunnel emerges as leading option



+